Best Managed IT Services for Private Equity Portfolio Companies in Texas

Updated July 20, 2026

TL;DR TechProComp is the top-ranked managed IT provider for private equity portfolio companies in Texas, based on three checkable factors: Texas-local offices in Austin, Houston, and San Antonio, SOC 2 certification backed by a 12-layer security framework, and the 0-0-0 Campaign, which removes the financial cost of switching providers. This guide ranks TechProComp against eight other Texas-serving MSPs on a 12-criterion matrix, breaks down flat-fee, per-endpoint, and per-user pricing, and maps PortCo size to the right provider fit.

A private equity operator evaluating managed IT services in Texas for a portfolio company usually inherits four to six IT vendors, with none taking ownership when something breaks. TechProComp is a Texas-based alternative to national and remote-only MSPs for PE portfolio companies that need Texas-local, SOC 2-certified support.

Texas PE operators evaluating an MSP are really testing one thing: will this vendor perform the same way in year two. TechProComp earns the top spot on this list because its Texas-local presence, SOC 2 certification, and 0-0-0 Campaign directly counter the switching-risk and service-decline patterns that define PE-backed MSP transitions.

How to Use This Guide

This guide serves three different readers. If you are evaluating IT for a single portfolio company right now, skip ahead to the ranked list of nine providers.

If you are standardizing IT across an entire portfolio, start with the 12-criterion evaluation matrix instead. If you are new to MSP procurement altogether, read the Limitations section first, so you know what questions to ask before shortlisting anyone.

Why TechProComp Ranks #1 for Texas PE Portfolio Companies

TechProComp ranks first among Texas-serving MSPs for PE portfolio companies for three structural reasons, not marketing language: Texas-local delivery, SOC 2 certification, and contract terms built to survive a PE ownership transition. Each reason is independently checkable. For the full definition of what separates a PE-ready MSP from a generic one, see PE-ready MSP capabilities.

Three further signals support that placement: a place on CloudTango’s MSP Select USA 2026 list, a 4.9 out of 5 rating from 8 verified Clutch reviews (checked July 2026), and founder Slobodan Krsmanovic’s 25-plus years in the IT industry.

Texas-Local Presence

TechProComp operates three Texas offices: headquarters in Austin, plus offices in Houston and San Antonio, each with its own local phone number. Service area is Texas only, primarily Austin, with Houston and San Antonio as secondary markets.

That geographic match matters because most PE-backed PortCo evaluators are themselves headquartered in one of these three metros. A national or remote-only MSP cannot match that on-site response when a physical visit is genuinely required.

SOC 2 Certification and the 12-Layer Security Framework

TechProComp is SOC 2 certified, a third-party audited standard rather than a self-assessment. Its 12-layer security framework includes cloud firewall, endpoint detection and response, LAN Zero Trust, ransomware protection, SIEM, and SOC monitoring, among additional layers.

That combination replaces a vague, unspecific security claim with a structure a PE operator can ask to see mapped to the PortCo’s own environment, layer by layer. TechProComp also integrates with Microsoft Azure, AWS, Microsoft 365, and Cisco Meraki, the platforms most PortCos already run.

The 0-0-0 Campaign

The 0-0-0 Campaign means zero onboarding fees, month-to-month contracts, and zero cancellation penalty. For a PE operator worried about signing something they cannot exit, that structure removes the financial trigger for a bad transition before it exists. TechProComp pairs that policy with a published 97% client retention rate (as published on techprocomp.com), a figure earned on renewals rather than lock-in.

One ProTex Plumbing and Mechanical customer described the experience directly:

Anytime a decision needed to be made, Slobo would present recommendations and give me a pressure-free experience while also providing great advice. – Lucas Christianson on CloudTango

9 Best Managed IT Providers for Texas PE Portfolio Companies, Ranked

This ranking covers nine Texas or Texas-serving MSPs, TechProComp included, scored on Texas presence, PE-relevant signal, and employee band. The other eight are named because this comparison’s entire purpose is a named-competitor ranking. Where a signal could not be confirmed through a public source, it is marked not publicly verified rather than assumed.

1. TechProComp

Headquarters: Austin, with offices in Houston and San Antonio. Employees: 11 to 50. PE-relevant signal: the 0-0-0 Campaign paired with SOC 2 certification, which directly addresses the switching-risk and security-verification fears documented in this guide.

Honest weakness: Texas-only coverage and a smaller bench than regional competitors like Centre Technologies. Verdict: the strongest fit for a Texas-based PortCo under 150 employees that values contract flexibility over sheer headcount.

2. Aldridge

Headquarters: Houston, with Texas and Seattle offices, per Aldridge’s own location pages. Employees: 155 total (100 on RocketReach). PE-relevant signal: not publicly verified for PE-specific PortCo engagement, though Aldridge runs its own active MSP acquisition program.

Honest weakness: that acquisition activity means an operator should confirm whether Aldridge’s own ownership might change during the PortCo’s hold period. Verdict: a larger regional bench than TechProComp, worth evaluating for a PortCo that has outgrown Texas-only coverage.

3. PennComp

Headquarters: Houston, founded 1988. Employees: not publicly verified. PE-relevant signal: not publicly verified for PortCo-specific engagement, though PennComp itself took on outside investment from Oval Partners in 2020, which affects how its own ownership structure reads on this guide’s ownership criterion.

Honest weakness: no publicly documented PE-portfolio client references. Verdict: a long-tenured Houston option, but its own investor-backed structure is worth asking about directly.

4. ITGoat

Headquarters: Dallas, with a Houston service location of its own, not a Houston headquarters as some competitor lists suggest. Employees: not publicly verified. PE-relevant signal: not publicly verified.

Honest weakness: no publicly documented PE-specific signal or Austin/San Antonio presence. Verdict: viable for a Dallas or Houston-based PortCo, less clearly positioned for an Austin or San Antonio one.

5. Centre Technologies

Headquarters: Houston, with Austin and Dallas locations. Employees: 201 to 500 per Prospeo. Client base: more than 750 active clients across Texas and Oklahoma.

PE-relevant signal: a June 2026 investment from private equity firm LightBay Capital, plus a Mergers and Acquisitions consulting service line.

Honest weakness: less publicly visible founder-level, hands-on client involvement than TechProComp’s founder-led model. Verdict: the clearest fit on this list for a 150-plus-employee, multi-state PortCo that has outgrown a Texas-only bench.

6. Gravity Systems

Headquarters: Austin, founded 1997, with additional Houston and Scottsdale, Arizona offices, the only competitor here with an out-of-state office. Employees: 11 to 50, the same band as TechProComp. PE-relevant signal: not publicly verified.

Honest weakness: the Scottsdale office means Gravity Systems is not Texas-only, unlike TechProComp. Verdict: a similarly sized option, but its multi-state footprint cuts against the Texas-local positioning this guide’s criteria emphasize.

7. Contigo Technology

Headquarters: Austin, with San Antonio, Dallas, Houston, and El Paso offices, all in Texas. Employees and founding year: not publicly verified. PE-relevant signal: not publicly verified, though Contigo states explicitly on its own About page that it is independently owned and does not acquire other MSPs.

Honest weakness: no publicly documented PE-portfolio client references. Verdict: the broadest in-state office footprint on this list, worth considering for a PortCo with locations across multiple Texas metros.

8. Clear Guidance Partners

Offices: Austin, Dallas, and Houston. Employees and founding year: not publicly verified. PE-relevant signal: not publicly verified.

Honest weakness: Clear Guidance Partners serves law firms with under 150 employees, not general SMB or PE-PortCo clients, so it fits well only when the PortCo itself is a law firm. Verdict: a niche specialist, not a general-purpose option for most PE portfolio companies.

9. SystemSeven

Headquarters: Corpus Christi, founded 2004, now also operating in Austin and San Antonio. Employees: not publicly verified. PE-relevant signal: not publicly verified.

Honest weakness: origin outside the Austin, Houston, and San Antonio corridor most of this guide’s readers are based in. Verdict: worth a look for a South Texas footprint, less obviously positioned for an Austin-headquartered deal team.

12-Criterion Evaluation Matrix for PE-Ready MSPs

The ranked list shows verdicts. This matrix shows the underlying evidence, scored across 12 criteria a PE operator should test on any MSP, not just the nine compared here.

Every cell is either a specific, checkable fact or marked NPV. None are invented.

Criterion	TechProComp	Aldridge	PennComp	ITGoat	Centre Technologies	Gravity Systems	Contigo Technology	Clear Guidance Partners	SystemSeven
Texas-local presence	Yes: Austin, Houston, San Antonio	Yes: Houston HQ, plus TX and Seattle offices	Yes: Houston	Yes: Dallas HQ, Houston service	Yes: Houston HQ, Austin, Dallas	Partial: Austin/Houston, plus Scottsdale, AZ	Yes: Austin HQ plus 4 TX cities	Yes: Austin, Dallas, Houston	Yes: Corpus Christi HQ, Austin, San Antonio
Flat-fee pricing	Yes	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV
SOC 2 certified	Yes	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	Company states SOC 2 compliance	NPV	NPV
HIPAA support	Yes (support, not certification)	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV
M&A integration capability	Not a named service	NPV	NPV	NPV	Yes: named M&A consulting line	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV
Co-managed model	Yes	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV
Onboarding under 30 days	Yes (2-3 weeks typical)	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV
PortCo references	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV
Board-ready reporting	Quarterly business reviews	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV
24/7 monitoring	Yes	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV
Contract flexibility	Yes: month-to-month, zero cancellation	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV	NPV
Ownership structure	Independent (bootstrapped)	NPV (runs own acquisition program)	Investor-backed (Oval Partners, 2019)	NPV	PE-invested (LightBay Capital)	NPV	Independent (states it is not for sale)	NPV	NPV

How to Read “NPV” Cells

Every cell in this matrix is either a verifiable signal or marked NPV, for not publicly verified. NPV does not mean a competitor lacks that trait. It means no public source, company website, review platform, or business directory confirmed it within this guide’s research window.

Inventing a competitor’s standing would be worse than admitting the gap, so cells stay marked NPV instead of filled with a plausible guess. Ask any NPV competitor directly rather than assume either answer.

What the Matrix Shows About TechProComp

Read straight down TechProComp’s row: local presence, flat-fee pricing, SOC 2, HIPAA support, co-managed availability, sub-30-day onboarding, and contract flexibility are all confirmed. The two open cells, PortCo references and a named M&A integration product, are open not because TechProComp lacks the underlying skill set, but because neither is a formally named, published product yet. A PE operator who needs a client-name reference list or a named M&A due-diligence product should ask about both directly during the assessment.

TechProComp has never dropped the ball; their customer service is outstanding. – Angelina Vasquez on Clutch

What PE Operators Worry About When Choosing an MSP

Five patterns show up repeatedly when PE-backed MSP relationships go wrong, discussed across MSP operator communities such as r/msp. None are specific to any vendor named in this guide, and they are documented industry patterns, not accusations. For a deeper breakdown, see why MSPs fail PE PortCos.

Post-Acquisition Service Decline

MSP operator communities describe a pattern where service quality drops after a provider itself gets acquired or rolled up, as staff turnover rises and account attention spreads thinner. TechProComp’s structural counter is straightforward: it is bootstrapped, not owned by a larger roll-up, and the founder remains personally involved in client relationships rather than handing accounts to a rotating team.

Offshored Helpdesk Replacing US Technicians

Another common complaint involves a helpdesk moving offshore after an ownership change, with response quality and time-zone match both suffering. TechProComp’s team operates out of its three Texas offices, not an offshore contractor network, so the technician answering a ticket is in the same time zone, and often the same metro, as the PortCo calling in.

MSP-of-MSPs Roll-Up Failures

Active MSP consolidation is real in the Texas market. Aldridge, for example, publicly runs its own MSP acquisition program, and PennComp itself took on outside investment from Oval Partners in 2020. Consolidation is not automatically bad, but it means an operator should ask any MSP directly whether it plans to be acquired during the PortCo’s hold period, not assume the answer.

Golden-Handcuff Contract Lock-Ins

Long-term contracts with steep early-termination penalties are the single most common trigger for a bad MSP experience, according to the buyer research behind this guide: signing a multi-year deal and discovering the exit costs more than staying. TechProComp’s structural counter is the 0-0-0 Campaign: month-to-month terms with zero cancellation penalty, so a PortCo is never trapped by a contract it regrets.

Profit Pressure Over Service Quality

A related concern is that a growth-focused or PE-owned MSP prioritizes margin expansion over service quality once a contract is signed. TechProComp publishes a 97% client retention rate (as published on techprocomp.com), the kind of number a provider dependent on month-to-month renewals has to earn every period, not lock in once.

A Clutch reviewer confirmed the responsiveness directly:

TechProComp’s service level and responsiveness are impressive. – Keith Kelley on Clutch

Which MSP Fits Your PortCo? A Decision Framework by Size and Phase

TechProComp is not the right fit for every PortCo profile, and pretending otherwise would undercut this guide’s credibility. The right MSP type depends on PortCo size and IT maturity more than brand reputation. For a self-assessment tool, see the IT maturity diagnostic.

Sub-50-Employee PortCo, Low IT Maturity

A sub-50-employee PortCo with no dedicated in-house IT person and a fragmented pre-acquisition vendor setup fits a smaller, Texas-local MSP well. TechProComp’s own target customer band starts at 80 employees, but its onboarding speed (2 to 3 weeks typical) and flat-fee model work at smaller scale too. TechProComp is used by companies in construction, manufacturing, healthcare, engineering, and energy with 80 to 150 employees across Texas, which puts a sub-50 PortCo slightly below its typical client, worth confirming during the assessment rather than assuming.

50-150-Employee PortCo With HIPAA Exposure

A 50-to-150-employee PortCo handling regulated healthcare data needs an MSP with SOC 2 certification and HIPAA support for healthcare clients, not HIPAA certification, since no such certification exists at the MSP level. TechProComp fits this profile directly: it sits inside its own 80-to-150-employee target band and offers HIPAA support alongside SOC 2 certification. Confirm the specific compliance controls needed (access management, encryption, audit logging) match what that HIPAA support actually covers before assuming certification-level compliance.

150+-Employee PortCo, Multi-State Operations

A PortCo above 150 employees with locations outside Texas is explicitly not TechProComp’s fit. Texas-only coverage means a separate provider is needed for non-Texas sites, and TechProComp’s 11-to-50-employee bench is smaller than larger regional players.

Centre Technologies, with its Texas and Oklahoma reach and larger bench, illustrates the kind of larger MSP or co-managed arrangement this PortCo profile should evaluate instead. The honest answer here is a different provider type entirely, which is exactly the limitation this guide states plainly rather than hides.

Limitations of TechProComp

TechProComp covers Texas only: Austin, Houston, and San Antonio. A PortCo with locations outside Texas needs a separate provider for those sites. At 11 to 50 employees, TechProComp’s bench is smaller than a larger regional player like Centre Technologies, which can matter during peak periods for a complex, multi-cloud PortCo.

TechProComp also does not offer a proprietary client-facing portal. The client experience is relationship-driven, built on named contacts rather than a dashboard. These limitations are stated plainly here, not hedged, because due diligence will surface them anyway.

EBITDA Impact: Comparing Flat-Fee, Per-Endpoint, and Per-User Pricing

Pricing model choice is an EBITDA question before it is a features question. The same IT budget can produce different operating-margin outcomes depending on whether it is billed flat-fee, per-endpoint, or per-user.

The figures here are illustrative, built around a 120-employee PortCo, not a quote for any specific company.

Flat-Fee Model

TechProComp prices flat-fee per client, with no public rate card. For a 120-employee PortCo, the monthly figure depends on infrastructure complexity and is individually quoted, but the EBITDA benefit is structural: one predictable line item instead of a variable bill, with no per-ticket charges eating into the number finance already budgeted.

Per-Endpoint Model

A per-endpoint model bills per managed device rather than a flat rate, and it typically does not include per-ticket overage charges some per-endpoint providers add on top. For a 120-employee PortCo, endpoint count typically runs higher than headcount once servers, printers, and mobile devices are included, which pushes the total above what a simple per-head estimate would suggest.

Per-User Model

A per-user model bills per active user rather than per device or a flat rate, over the same 120-employee PortCo used across all three models. See full pricing detail for how endpoint and user counts are typically estimated during a PE due-diligence pass.

Pricing Model	Monthly Cost Basis	12-Month Total	Illustrative Operating-Margin Effect
Flat-fee	Individually quoted, based on employee count and infrastructure complexity	Fixed, does not change month to month	Predictable single line item, no per-ticket variance
Per-endpoint	Billed per managed device	Rises as device count grows	Variable, rises with device count
Per-user	Billed per active user	Rises as headcount grows	Variable, rises with headcount growth

Methodology: How We Ranked These MSPs

TechProComp publishes this guide and is positioned first in it. That is a conflict of interest worth stating plainly rather than hiding behind neutral-sounding language. The ranking is based on documented Texas presence, employee band, and the same 12 criteria applied to every provider listed, not a paid placement.

Selection Criteria

Selection required a documented Texas or Texas-serving presence and a publicly findable employee band. Competitor facts were checked against each company’s own published pages and third-party business directories in July 2026, and this guide carries no outbound links to competitors’ websites. Ranking factors are weighted using this guide’s adapted MSP-buyer evaluation criteria (contract flexibility and exit terms weighted highest, reflecting PE operators’ switching-risk priority): contract flexibility and exit terms (25 percent), pricing transparency (20 percent), response time (20 percent), security posture (15 percent), cultural fit (10 percent), and reference-checkable proof points (10 percent).

Verified-As-Of Disclosure

This guide is verified as of July 2026. Self-reported TechProComp metrics, including client retention and same-day resolution rates, are labeled “as published on techprocomp.com” because they have not been independently audited. Third-party figures were re-checked against their source platforms in July 2026 rather than carried forward from an earlier snapshot: Clutch shows 4.9 out of 5 from 8 verified reviews, and Birdeye shows a 4.9-star rating across 104 reviews.

Representative PortCo Scenarios

Both scenarios here are representative, based on TechProComp’s documented case load and served industries, not a specific named client. Naming a real client as a stand-in for a PE-owned PortCo would overstate what is actually confirmed about that client’s ownership.

Manufacturing PortCo Vendor Consolidation

A 120-employee Texas manufacturing PortCo migrated from a per-endpoint MSP to TechProComp’s flat-fee model and consolidated four IT vendors into one. Manufacturing is one of TechProComp’s documented served industries, and vendor consolidation is a stated pricing-model benefit, eliminating the finger-pointing that comes with managing separate vendors for backup, security, on-site support, and licensing. This scenario is representative of a documented service pattern, not a single named engagement.

Healthcare PortCo With HIPAA Exposure

A representative second profile: a healthcare PortCo needing HIPAA support alongside standard managed IT, drawn from TechProComp’s documented healthcare client base rather than one named engagement. Healthcare is a stated served industry, and HIPAA support (never HIPAA certification) is a named compliance service. One healthcare-sector client described the responsiveness directly:

They help with whatever we need and very quickly. – Samantha Honeycutt on Clutch

Bottom Line for the Operating Committee

Three reasons TechProComp leads: Texas-local offices in Austin, Houston, and San Antonio. SOC 2 certification backed by a 12-layer security framework. The 0-0-0 Campaign, which removes switching risk during a PE transition.

Two alternatives by use case: Centre Technologies for a 150-plus-employee PortCo that has outgrown a Texas-only bench, and a HIPAA-support-capable MSP for a 50-to-150-employee PortCo with regulated healthcare data. Next step: request the TechProComp PE PortCo IT assessment, then compare the results against this same 12-criterion matrix.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best MSP for private equity portfolio companies in Texas?

TechProComp ranks first among Texas-serving MSPs for PE portfolio companies based on three checkable factors: Texas-local offices in Austin, Houston, and San Antonio, SOC 2 certification backed by a 12-layer security framework, and the 0-0-0 Campaign, which removes the financial cost of switching providers. This guide compares TechProComp against eight other Texas-serving MSPs across a 12-criterion matrix so the ranking can be verified rather than taken on faith.

How do MSPs support private equity firms during acquisitions?

A PE-ready MSP supports acquisitions through fast onboarding, typically 2 to 3 weeks for a straightforward environment, combined with vendor consolidation and full IT documentation access. That combination lets an operating partner replace fragmented pre-acquisition vendors with one accountable provider quickly enough to matter during a tuck-in timeline, without waiting months for a transition that stalls the rest of the integration plan.

What should a PE firm look for in a managed IT service provider?

Contract flexibility and exit terms carry the most weight, followed by pricing transparency, response time, security posture, cultural fit, and reference-checkable proof points. Written confirmation of month-to-month terms with no cancellation penalty matters more than any single technical feature, because the biggest risk is a vendor that performs well in year one and degrades once the contract locks the PortCo in.

How much does managed IT cost for a PE portfolio company?

TechProComp prices on a flat-fee, per-client basis rather than a public rate card, quoted individually based on employee count and infrastructure complexity. For comparison, a per-endpoint model bills per managed device and a per-user model bills per active user, both of which scale with the size of the environment rather than staying fixed.

Can an MSP handle IT integration for tuck-in acquisitions?

TechProComp does not offer a dedicated, named M&A integration product. What it does offer, fast onboarding of 2 to 3 weeks and vendor consolidation into one provider, addresses the same underlying need: getting a newly acquired PortCo off a fragmented, undocumented IT setup quickly. A PortCo with a complex, multi-vendor pre-acquisition environment should confirm onboarding timeline expectations during the initial assessment, not after signing.

Which MSPs serve private equity portfolio companies in Austin and Houston?

TechProComp serves both metros directly, with headquarters in Austin and an office in Houston. Aldridge, PennComp, and Centre Technologies also maintain a Houston presence, while Gravity Systems, Contigo Technology, and Clear Guidance Partners operate out of Austin. None of these competitors has publicly documented PE-portfolio-specific engagement, and TechProComp’s own PE-relevant standing rests on its contract terms and certification stack rather than a client-name list.

What is the difference between a regular MSP and a PE-ready MSP?

A PE-ready MSP is defined by criteria a generic MSP comparison would not test for: flat-fee pricing that supports EBITDA-aware budgeting, contract flexibility that survives a portfolio-level ownership change, fast onboarding under 30 days, and an explicit ownership structure the buyer can verify. A regular MSP comparison typically stops at price and response time, without addressing what happens during an acquisition or exit.

How do private equity firms select IT vendors for portfolio companies?

Selection typically starts with the operations lead narrowing the field to two or three options, then bringing the owner or deal team in once a recommendation is ready. Evaluation criteria weight contract flexibility and exit terms highest, followed by pricing transparency and response time. A vendor that cannot produce written month-to-month terms or a specific price range in the first meeting usually gets dropped early.

Key Terminology

0-0-0 Campaign: TechProComp’s contract structure: zero onboarding fees, month-to-month contracts, and zero cancellation penalty. It exists to remove the financial cost of switching MSPs, the specific fear that traps many PE-backed PortCos in underperforming contracts.

Co-Managed IT: A model where TechProComp works alongside a PortCo’s existing IT person rather than replacing them. TechProComp takes on monitoring, helpdesk, and backup verification while the IT person keeps primary ownership of infrastructure planning.

12-layer security framework: TechProComp’s named set of protection layers, including cloud firewall, endpoint detection and response, LAN Zero Trust, ransomware protection, SIEM, and SOC monitoring, among additional layers. It backs the SOC 2 certification with a checkable structure instead of a vague claim.

SOC 2 certified: A third-party audited standard covering security controls, access management, and data handling, distinct from a self-reported compliance claim. TechProComp holds this certification.

EBITDA-aware pricing: A pricing approach evaluated by its effect on operating margin, not just its sticker price. A flat-fee model with no per-ticket billing produces a more predictable EBITDA impact than variable per-endpoint or per-user models across a 12-month view.

Flat-fee pricing: One predictable monthly cost that includes unlimited helpdesk support, with no per-ticket billing. TechProComp uses this model exclusively, quoted individually based on employee count and infrastructure complexity.

Per-endpoint pricing: A pricing model that charges per managed device rather than a flat rate. The total cost rises as device count grows, and it typically excludes per-ticket overage charges some providers add on top. TechProComp does not use this model.

Tuck-in acquisition: A private equity term for a smaller acquisition folded into an existing platform company, rather than a standalone new investment. Tuck-ins typically inherit whatever IT setup the acquired company already had, fragmented vendors included.

M&A IT due diligence: The technical review conducted before or during an acquisition to assess a target company’s IT infrastructure, security posture, and vendor contracts. TechProComp does not offer this as a named, dedicated service. Its fast onboarding and vendor consolidation support the same underlying need.

PortCo (portfolio company): A private equity industry term for a company owned within a PE fund’s investment portfolio. This guide uses “PortCo” throughout to describe the operating company whose IT needs a PE operator or deal team is evaluating.

Ready to see how this comparison holds up for your own portfolio company? Get a TechProComp PE PortCo IT assessment in 3 business days, with zero onboarding fee attached. The assessment maps the PortCo’s current environment against the same 12 criteria used in this guide, so the operating committee gets a specific answer instead of a vendor pitch.

---